Skip to content

CPU_VS_GPU / 2026-09-11

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KvsNVIDIA RTX 5090

Complete bottleneck analysis at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide (UWQHD/SUWQHD), and 4K with estimated FPS for popular games.

VERDICT2560x1440 · 16GB DDR4/DDR5
RESOLUTION LIMITS

35%

RESOLUTION LIMIT (GPU OVERKILL)

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has more capacity than 2560x1440 can use, even with a CPU as fast as the Core Ultra 5 245K: around 35% of it sits idle. A higher resolution or heavier settings would put that capacity to work; that buys image quality rather than frames, so the frame rate will come down, not up.

PROCESSOR97%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KSETS THE LIMIT
holds 309 FPS on average
GRAPHICS68%
NVIDIA RTX 5090HAS HEADROOM
holds 441 FPS on average

Load estimated by the model, not measured on your PC.

The processor leadsBalancedThe graphics card leads
  • PROCESSORIntel Core Ultra 5 245K
  • GRAPHICSNVIDIA RTX 5090
  • MEMORY16GB DDR4/DDR5
  • RESOLUTION2560x1440
122FPSAAA GAMES

Average across the demanding titles at 2560x1440.

448FPSE-SPORTS

Average across the competitive titles, where the processor leads.

1150WPOWER SUPPLY YOU NEED

What the build draws (850 W) plus headroom.

DEEP-DIVE ANALYSIS

GENERATED BY THE ENGINE

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and the NVIDIA RTX 5090 each bring their own character. Below you'll see whether the union is balanced or whether one component wastes the other, with estimated FPS, power draw and recommendations tailored to this specific pair.

Verdict: play this build at 5K

At 1080p the RTX 5090 has power to spare and sits partly idle, whereas at 4K the two stay well balanced. One number decides the purchase: 5K is the most demanding of the standard 16:9 sizes that still sustains 68 FPS on average in AAA games, above the 60 FPS bar we treat as smooth. Step up a rung and the frame rate drops below that mark.

Resolution reshuffles the priorities. At 1080p the Core Ultra 5 245K's single-thread speed calls the shots; at 4K it's the raw muscle of the RTX 5090 that matters. That shift shows up in the numbers: 52% efficiency at 1080p versus 100% at 4K.

In esports titles like Valorant this pair flies — around 757 FPS at 1080p, plenty for a high-refresh monitor. At the other end, a demanding AAA like Elden Ring drops to ~60 FPS at 4K, which is where the RTX 5090's ceiling really shows. Overall, expect about 130 FPS average in AAA games at 1080p and around 91 FPS at 4K.

[CPU] Core Ultra 5 245K

The Core Ultra 5 245K (82/100 on the model's gaming scale) brings 14 cores and 14 threads and determines how many frames per second the system can prepare.

[GPU] RTX 5090

The RTX 5090 (96/100 on the model's gaming scale) supplies the raster muscle of the build. Its 32 GB of GDDR7 set how far it can go on resolution and texture quality before video memory runs short.

Beyond the FPS: Both parts come from nearby generations, which usually means a natural pairing with no platform surprises. You're combining an Intel platform with an NVIDIA GPU — a perfectly valid mix that imposes no penalty.

DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANYTHING?

At 1440p the RTX 5090 has capacity to spare, and no part swap would raise the frame rate noticeably. A higher resolution or heavier settings put that capacity to work — that buys image quality, not frames, so expect the frame rate to come down rather than up. If 1440p is enough for you, nothing needs changing.

PRICE OF EACH PART

Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you. Full disclosure

SPECIFICATIONS

CATALOGUE DATA

[CPU] Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

  • Cores14C / 14T
  • Clock4.25.2 GHz
  • TDP125 W
  • SocketLGA1851
  • Single-thread4,600
  • Multi-thread38,115
  • L3 cache24 MB

[GPU] NVIDIA RTX 5090

  • VRAM32 GB GDDR7
  • Memory bus512-bit
  • TDP575 W
  • G3D Mark57,120
  • Memory bandwidth1792 GB/s

BOTTLENECK BY RESOLUTION

SYNERGY · AVERAGE FPS
1920x1080GPU OVERKILL
Synergy52%AAA130E-SPORTS448

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has far more capacity than 1920x1080 can use: around 48% of it sits idle. Stepping up to 1440p or 4K would put that capacity to work at the cost of some frames: you gain sharpness, not speed.

2560x1440GPU OVERKILL
Synergy65%AAA122E-SPORTS448

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has more capacity than 2560x1440 can use, even with a CPU as fast as the Core Ultra 5 245K: around 35% of it sits idle. A higher resolution or heavier settings would put that capacity to work; that buys image quality rather than frames, so the frame rate will come down, not up.

3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9)CPU-LIMITED
Synergy89%AAA114E-SPORTS448

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 245K) introduces a slight limitation at 3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9). Real-world impact is small and both components work well together.

5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9)BALANCED
Synergy100%AAA97E-SPORTS448

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 245K) and GPU (RTX 5090) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9). No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

3840x2160BALANCED
Synergy100%AAA91E-SPORTS447

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 245K) and GPU (RTX 5090) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 4K. No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

ESTIMATED FPS BY GAME

1920x1080
My monitor
E-SPORTSavg 618 FPS
Valorant
757FPS
Counter-Strike 2
478FPS
League of Legends
620FPS
COMPETITIVEavg 278 FPS
Fortnite (Perf Mode)
332FPS
Apex Legends
300FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone
202FPS
AAAavg 130 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
186FPS
Alan Wake 2
139FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
125FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
141FPS
Elden Ring
60FPS
The processor leadsThe graphics card leadsHigh settings · native resolution

SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS

POWER · VRAM & PCIe · RAM

POWER ESTIMATION

Combined TDP:700 W
Min. Recommended PSU:1150 W

The Core Ultra 5 245K (125W) and RTX 5090 (575W) add up to roughly 700W under load. Adding 150W for the rest of the system gives 850W, and with a 30% transient margin, 1150W is the safe figure.

VIDEO MEMORY AND PCIe

Memory bus (VRAM):512-bit
Memory bandwidth:1792 GB/s
PCIe link:Not recorded

The RTX 5090's memory bus (512-bit) and bandwidth (1792 GB/s) describe its own video memory, meaning how fast the card reads its 32 GB of GDDR7, not the PCIe link to the processor. The PCIe link depends on the card, the processor and the motherboard slot together; our catalogue does not record PCIe generation or lane count, so the model does not estimate it. It matters most for cards with an eight-lane interface in older PCIe 3.0 boards: check the card's and the board's specifications.

SYSTEM MEMORY

This page assumes:16 GB · dual channel
Model target at 5K:16 GB

This page assumes 16 GB in dual channel. At 5K, the resolution recommended above, that meets the model's capacity target of 16 GB (enough for three in four of the games it covers), so more capacity would add little or nothing there. The target stays at 16 GB even at 4K, so a larger kit is for heavy multitasking or mods, not for these games. Memory speed and a second channel act on the processor's ceiling instead: they matter in the games the CPU limits, by an amount that depends on the game, and the calculator lets you enter your own kit.

HOW THIS PAGE IS CALCULATED

ENGINE v2026.08 · 2026-09-11

CALCULATED, NOT WRITTEN

Every figure and every sentence comes from the same deterministic engine, driven by the catalogue specifications. That is what makes it reproducible: with the same engine version (2026.08) and the same catalogue, the same pairing always gives the same result. When either changes, the version and date above change with it, and the changelog says why.

WHERE THE DATA COMES FROM

Specifications come from the official AMD, Intel and NVIDIA datasheets together with PassMark and TechPowerUp. The gaming indices are calibrated against frame rates published by review outlets (TechPowerUp, TechSpot / Hardware Unboxed, Tom's Hardware, Gamers Nexus, Digital Foundry) rather than synthetic scores. That data is compiled, not measured here: this site runs no test bench of its own.

STATED LIMITS

Figures estimate native raster performance at high/ultra quality, with no ray tracing, upscaling or frame generation. We do not yet publish an externally validated error margin — the accuracy page states exactly where that stands.

* Affiliate disclosure: the Amazon links exist to show pricing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Recommendation order is decided by the engine and does not depend on commission.

TRY WITH YOUR OWN HARDWARE

Customize RAM, resolution, and discover upgrade recommendations.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

5
Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K bottleneck the NVIDIA RTX 5090?

At 1080p the RTX 5090 has power to spare and sits partly idle, whereas at 4K the two stay well balanced. Overall, there is some mismatch depending on resolution, with 82% average efficiency across the 12 resolutions our model tests. The resolution we would target with this pair is 5K, where AAA games average 68 FPS.

How many FPS do the Core Ultra 5 245K and RTX 5090 get at 1080p?

At 1080p this combination averages about 130 FPS in AAA games and around 448 FPS in esports titles. In Valorant we estimate up to 757 FPS.

Is this pairing good for 4K gaming?

Yes. At 4K this pairing averages about 91 FPS in AAA titles, at or above the 60 FPS we treat as smooth.

What power supply do I need for the Core Ultra 5 245K and RTX 5090?

With an estimated combined draw of 700W across CPU and GPU, we recommend at least an 1150W 80+ Gold supply (ideally ATX 3.0) to run with headroom.

Is the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM enough?

In the model, 32 GB covers all 11 games it tracks even at 4K with high textures, so video memory is not the constraint for this pairing.

RELATED COMPARISONS

6