Skip to content

CPU_VS_GPU / 2026-09-11

Intel Core Ultra 5 225FvsNVIDIA RTX 5090

Complete bottleneck analysis at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide (UWQHD/SUWQHD), and 4K with estimated FPS for popular games.

VERDICT2560x1440 · 16GB DDR4/DDR5
RESOLUTION LIMITS

40%

RESOLUTION LIMIT (GPU OVERKILL)

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has more capacity than 2560x1440 can use, even with a CPU as fast as the Core Ultra 5 225F: around 40% of it sits idle. A higher resolution or heavier settings would put that capacity to work; that buys image quality rather than frames, so the frame rate will come down, not up.

PROCESSOR99%
Intel Core Ultra 5 225FSETS THE LIMIT
holds 276 FPS on average
GRAPHICS61%
NVIDIA RTX 5090HAS HEADROOM
holds 448 FPS on average

Load estimated by the model, not measured on your PC.

The processor leadsBalancedThe graphics card leads
  • PROCESSORIntel Core Ultra 5 225F
  • GRAPHICSNVIDIA RTX 5090
  • MEMORY16GB DDR4/DDR5
  • RESOLUTION2560x1440
111FPSAAA GAMES

Average across the demanding titles at 2560x1440.

409FPSE-SPORTS

Average across the competitive titles, where the processor leads.

1050WPOWER SUPPLY YOU NEED

What the build draws (790 W) plus headroom.

DEEP-DIVE ANALYSIS

GENERATED BY THE ENGINE

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F and the NVIDIA RTX 5090 each bring their own character. Below you'll see whether the union is balanced or whether one component wastes the other, with estimated FPS, power draw and recommendations tailored to this specific pair.

Verdict: play this build at 5K

At 1080p the RTX 5090 has power to spare and sits partly idle, whereas at 4K the two stay well balanced. Of the common 16:9 sizes, the highest this pair holds above 60 FPS in AAA titles is 5K, where it averages 68 FPS — that is the resolution worth buying a monitor for. Across every resolution tested, ultrawides included, the system runs at 78% average efficiency.

As you climb from 1080p to 4K, the load shifts from the processor toward the graphics card: every extra pixel lands on the RTX 5090. Here, efficiency moves from 45% at 1080p to 99% at 4K — which shows the part the frame rate depends on at each end.

In esports titles like Valorant this pair flies — around 694 FPS at 1080p, plenty for a high-refresh monitor. At the other end, a demanding AAA like Elden Ring drops to ~60 FPS at 4K, which is where the RTX 5090's ceiling really shows. Overall, expect about 114 FPS average in AAA games at 1080p and around 91 FPS at 4K.

[CPU] Core Ultra 5 225F

The Core Ultra 5 225F (78/100 on the model's gaming scale) brings 10 cores and 10 threads and determines how many frames per second the system can prepare.

[GPU] RTX 5090

The RTX 5090 (96/100 on the model's gaming scale) supplies the raster muscle of the build. Its 32 GB of GDDR7 set how far it can go on resolution and texture quality before video memory runs short.

On the chemistry of the pair: Both parts come from nearby generations, which usually means a natural pairing with no platform surprises. You're combining an Intel platform with an NVIDIA GPU — a perfectly valid mix that imposes no penalty.

DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANYTHING?

At 1440p the RTX 5090 has capacity to spare, and no part swap would raise the frame rate noticeably. A higher resolution or heavier settings put that capacity to work — that buys image quality, not frames, so expect the frame rate to come down rather than up. If 1440p is enough for you, nothing needs changing.

PRICE OF EACH PART

Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you. Full disclosure

SPECIFICATIONS

CATALOGUE DATA

[CPU] Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

  • Cores10C / 10T
  • Clock3.34.9 GHz
  • TDP65 W
  • SocketLGA1851
  • Single-thread4,400
  • Multi-thread31,041
  • L3 cache20 MB

[GPU] NVIDIA RTX 5090

  • VRAM32 GB GDDR7
  • Memory bus512-bit
  • TDP575 W
  • G3D Mark57,120
  • Memory bandwidth1792 GB/s

BOTTLENECK BY RESOLUTION

SYNERGY · AVERAGE FPS
1920x1080GPU OVERKILL
Synergy45%AAA114E-SPORTS409

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has far more capacity than 1920x1080 can use: around 55% of it sits idle. Stepping up to 1440p or 4K would put that capacity to work at the cost of some frames: you gain sharpness, not speed.

2560x1440GPU OVERKILL
Synergy60%AAA111E-SPORTS409

Your GPU (RTX 5090) has more capacity than 2560x1440 can use, even with a CPU as fast as the Core Ultra 5 225F: around 40% of it sits idle. A higher resolution or heavier settings would put that capacity to work; that buys image quality rather than frames, so the frame rate will come down, not up.

3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9)CPU-LIMITED
Synergy83%AAA107E-SPORTS409

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 225F) partially limits the RTX 5090 at 3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9). In CPU-heavy scenes you will lose frames. Consider a CPU upgrade or a higher target resolution.

5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9)BALANCED
Synergy96%AAA97E-SPORTS409

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 225F) and GPU (RTX 5090) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9). No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

3840x2160BALANCED
Synergy99%AAA91E-SPORTS409

Your CPU (Core Ultra 5 225F) and GPU (RTX 5090) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 4K. No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

ESTIMATED FPS BY GAME

1920x1080
My monitor
E-SPORTSavg 568 FPS
Valorant
694FPS
Counter-Strike 2
438FPS
League of Legends
571FPS
COMPETITIVEavg 250 FPS
Fortnite (Perf Mode)
285FPS
Apex Legends
289FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone
175FPS
AAAavg 114 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
161FPS
Alan Wake 2
120FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
108FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
123FPS
Elden Ring
60FPS
The processor leadsThe graphics card leadsHigh settings · native resolution

SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS

POWER · VRAM & PCIe · RAM

POWER ESTIMATION

Combined TDP:640 W
Min. Recommended PSU:1050 W

The Core Ultra 5 225F (65W) and RTX 5090 (575W) add up to roughly 640W under load. Adding 150W for the rest of the system gives 790W, and with a 30% transient margin, 1050W is the safe figure.

VIDEO MEMORY AND PCIe

Memory bus (VRAM):512-bit
Memory bandwidth:1792 GB/s
PCIe link:Not recorded

The RTX 5090's memory bus (512-bit) and bandwidth (1792 GB/s) describe its own video memory, meaning how fast the card reads its 32 GB of GDDR7, not the PCIe link to the processor. The PCIe link depends on the card, the processor and the motherboard slot together; our catalogue does not record PCIe generation or lane count, so the model does not estimate it. It matters most for cards with an eight-lane interface in older PCIe 3.0 boards: check the card's and the board's specifications.

SYSTEM MEMORY

This page assumes:16 GB · dual channel
Model target at 5K:16 GB

This page assumes 16 GB in dual channel. At 5K, the resolution recommended above, that meets the model's capacity target of 16 GB (enough for three in four of the games it covers), so more capacity would add little or nothing there. The target stays at 16 GB even at 4K, so a larger kit is for heavy multitasking or mods, not for these games. Memory speed and a second channel act on the processor's ceiling instead: they matter in the games the CPU limits, by an amount that depends on the game, and the calculator lets you enter your own kit.

HOW THIS PAGE IS CALCULATED

ENGINE v2026.08 · 2026-09-11

CALCULATED, NOT WRITTEN

Every figure and every sentence comes from the same deterministic engine, driven by the catalogue specifications. That is what makes it reproducible: with the same engine version (2026.08) and the same catalogue, the same pairing always gives the same result. When either changes, the version and date above change with it, and the changelog says why.

WHERE THE DATA COMES FROM

Specifications come from the official AMD, Intel and NVIDIA datasheets together with PassMark and TechPowerUp. The gaming indices are calibrated against frame rates published by review outlets (TechPowerUp, TechSpot / Hardware Unboxed, Tom's Hardware, Gamers Nexus, Digital Foundry) rather than synthetic scores. That data is compiled, not measured here: this site runs no test bench of its own.

STATED LIMITS

Figures estimate native raster performance at high/ultra quality, with no ray tracing, upscaling or frame generation. We do not yet publish an externally validated error margin — the accuracy page states exactly where that stands.

* Affiliate disclosure: the Amazon links exist to show pricing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Recommendation order is decided by the engine and does not depend on commission.

TRY WITH YOUR OWN HARDWARE

Customize RAM, resolution, and discover upgrade recommendations.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

5
Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F bottleneck the NVIDIA RTX 5090?

At 1080p the RTX 5090 has power to spare and sits partly idle, whereas at 4K the two stay well balanced. Overall, there is some mismatch depending on resolution, with 78% average efficiency across the 12 resolutions our model tests. The resolution we would target with this pair is 5K, where AAA games average 68 FPS.

How many FPS do the Core Ultra 5 225F and RTX 5090 get at 1080p?

At 1080p this combination averages about 114 FPS in AAA games and around 409 FPS in esports titles. In Valorant we estimate up to 694 FPS.

Is this pairing good for 4K gaming?

Yes. At 4K this pairing averages about 91 FPS in AAA titles, at or above the 60 FPS we treat as smooth.

What power supply do I need for the Core Ultra 5 225F and RTX 5090?

With an estimated combined draw of 640W across CPU and GPU, we recommend at least a 1050W 80+ Gold supply (ideally ATX 3.0) to run with headroom.

Is the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM enough?

In the model, 32 GB covers all 11 games it tracks even at 4K with high textures, so video memory is not the constraint for this pairing.

RELATED COMPARISONS

6