Skip to content

CPU_VS_GPU / 2026-09-11

Intel Core i5-9400FvsNVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Complete bottleneck analysis at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide (UWQHD/SUWQHD), and 4K with estimated FPS for popular games.

VERDICT2560x1440 · 16GB DDR4/DDR5
BALANCED BUILD

7%

PERFECTLY BALANCED BUILD

Your CPU (Core i5-9400F) and GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 2560x1440. No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

PROCESSOR86%
Intel Core i5-9400FSETS THE LIMIT
holds 135 FPS on average
GRAPHICS79%
NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GBHAS HEADROOM
holds 146 FPS on average

Load estimated by the model, not measured on your PC.

The processor leadsBalancedThe graphics card leads
  • PROCESSORIntel Core i5-9400F
  • GRAPHICSNVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
  • MEMORY16GB DDR4/DDR5
  • RESOLUTION2560x1440
48FPSAAA GAMES

Average across the demanding titles at 2560x1440.

172FPSE-SPORTS

Average across the competitive titles, where the processor leads.

550WPOWER SUPPLY YOU NEED

What the build draws (380 W) plus headroom.

DEEP-DIVE ANALYSIS

GENERATED BY THE ENGINE

Pairing the Intel Core i5-9400F (46/100 on our gaming index) with the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (31/100) raises one practical question: do they pull together, or does one hold the other back? We ran this exact combination across all supported resolutions to answer it with numbers rather than guesswork.

Quick take: 1080p is the resolution to target

At 1080p the Core i5-9400F becomes the limiting part (~34% CPU bottleneck), whereas at 4K the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the limiting part (~31% GPU bottleneck). One number decides the purchase: 1080p is the most demanding of the standard 16:9 sizes that still sustains 61 FPS on average in AAA games, above the 60 FPS bar we treat as smooth. Step up a rung and the frame rate drops below that mark.

Resolution reshuffles the priorities. At 1080p the Core i5-9400F's single-thread speed calls the shots; at 4K it's the raw muscle of the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB that matters. That shift shows up in the numbers: 66% efficiency at 1080p versus 69% at 4K.

In esports titles like Valorant this pair flies — around 275 FPS at 1080p, plenty for a high-refresh monitor. At the other end, a demanding AAA like Alan Wake 2 drops to ~16 FPS at 4K, which is where the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's ceiling really shows. Overall, expect about 61 FPS average in AAA games at 1080p and around 31 FPS at 4K.

[CPU] Core i5-9400F

The Core i5-9400F (46/100 on the model's gaming scale) brings 6 cores and 6 threads and determines how many frames per second the system can prepare.

[GPU] RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

On the graphics side, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB rates 31/100 for gaming in this model. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 set how far it can go on resolution and texture quality before video memory runs short. The higher the resolution, the more of the frame rate depends on it.

On the chemistry of the pair: The graphics card is about 4 years newer than the processor, so watch that the Core i5-9400F doesn't fall short in the most CPU-dependent games. You're combining an Intel platform with an NVIDIA GPU — a perfectly valid mix that imposes no penalty.

DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANYTHING?

At 1440p neither part appreciably holds the other back, so there is nothing you need to change. The Core i5-9400F and the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB stand as they are; a 550W supply gives the build headroom.

PRICE OF EACH PART

Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you. Full disclosure

SPECIFICATIONS

CATALOGUE DATA

[CPU] Intel Core i5-9400F

  • Cores6C / 6T
  • Clock2.94.1 GHz
  • TDP65 W
  • SocketLGA1151
  • Single-thread2,421
  • Multi-thread9,457
  • L3 cache9 MB

[GPU] NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

  • VRAM16 GB GDDR6
  • Memory bus128-bit
  • TDP165 W
  • G3D Mark22,629
  • Memory bandwidth288 GB/s

BOTTLENECK BY RESOLUTION

SYNERGY · AVERAGE FPS
1920x1080CPU-LIMITED
Synergy66%AAA61E-SPORTS172

Your CPU (Core i5-9400F) cannot feed the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB fast enough at 1920x1080. The GPU sits waiting for frames, causing stutter and noticeable drops. A CPU upgrade is the highest-impact change you can make.

2560x1440BALANCED
Synergy93%AAA48E-SPORTS172

Your CPU (Core i5-9400F) and GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 2560x1440. No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9)BALANCED
Synergy93%AAA42E-SPORTS171

Your CPU (Core i5-9400F) and GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) are an exceptionally balanced match for gaming at 3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9). No realistic component swap would meaningfully improve this build.

5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9)GPU-LIMITED
Synergy74%AAA34E-SPORTS164

Your GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) is the limiting factor at 5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9). In graphically demanding titles you will see lower frame rates; a faster GPU would deliver a clear improvement.

3840x2160GPU-LIMITED
Synergy69%AAA31E-SPORTS162

Your GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) severely limits the system at 4K, leaving the Core i5-9400F heavily underused. A faster GPU would improve performance dramatically.

ESTIMATED FPS BY GAME

1920x1080
My monitor
E-SPORTSavg 231 FPS
Valorant
275FPS
Counter-Strike 2
175FPS
League of Legends
242FPS
COMPETITIVEavg 113 FPS
Fortnite (Perf Mode)
111FPS
Apex Legends
150FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone
78FPS
AAAavg 61 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
78FPS
Alan Wake 2
43FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
59FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
74FPS
Elden Ring
52FPS
The processor leadsThe graphics card leadsHigh settings · native resolution

SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS

POWER · VRAM & PCIe · RAM

POWER ESTIMATION

Combined TDP:230 W
Min. Recommended PSU:550 W

The Core i5-9400F (65W) and RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (165W) add up to roughly 230W under load. Adding 150W for the rest of the system gives 380W, and with a 30% transient margin, 550W is the safe figure.

VIDEO MEMORY AND PCIe

Memory bus (VRAM):128-bit
Memory bandwidth:288 GB/s
PCIe link:Not recorded

The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's memory bus (128-bit) and bandwidth (288 GB/s) describe its own video memory, meaning how fast the card reads its 16 GB of GDDR6, not the PCIe link to the processor. The PCIe link depends on the card, the processor and the motherboard slot together; our catalogue does not record PCIe generation or lane count, so the model does not estimate it. It matters most for cards with an eight-lane interface in older PCIe 3.0 boards: check the card's and the board's specifications.

SYSTEM MEMORY

This page assumes:16 GB · dual channel
Model target at 1080p:16 GB

This page assumes 16 GB in dual channel. At 1080p, the resolution recommended above, that meets the model's capacity target of 16 GB (enough for three in four of the games it covers), so more capacity would add little or nothing there. The target stays at 16 GB even at 4K, so a larger kit is for heavy multitasking or mods, not for these games. Memory speed and a second channel act on the processor's ceiling instead: they matter in the games the CPU limits, by an amount that depends on the game, and the calculator lets you enter your own kit.

HOW THIS PAGE IS CALCULATED

ENGINE v2026.08 · 2026-09-11

CALCULATED, NOT WRITTEN

Every figure and every sentence comes from the same deterministic engine, driven by the catalogue specifications. That is what makes it reproducible: with the same engine version (2026.08) and the same catalogue, the same pairing always gives the same result. When either changes, the version and date above change with it, and the changelog says why.

WHERE THE DATA COMES FROM

Specifications come from the official AMD, Intel and NVIDIA datasheets together with PassMark and TechPowerUp. The gaming indices are calibrated against frame rates published by review outlets (TechPowerUp, TechSpot / Hardware Unboxed, Tom's Hardware, Gamers Nexus, Digital Foundry) rather than synthetic scores. That data is compiled, not measured here: this site runs no test bench of its own.

STATED LIMITS

Figures estimate native raster performance at high/ultra quality, with no ray tracing, upscaling or frame generation. We do not yet publish an externally validated error margin — the accuracy page states exactly where that stands.

* Affiliate disclosure: the Amazon links exist to show pricing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Recommendation order is decided by the engine and does not depend on commission.

TRY WITH YOUR OWN HARDWARE

Customize RAM, resolution, and discover upgrade recommendations.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

5
Does the Intel Core i5-9400F bottleneck the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

At 1080p the Core i5-9400F becomes the limiting part (~34% CPU bottleneck), whereas at 4K the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the limiting part (~31% GPU bottleneck). Overall, the GPU is the limit at high resolution, with 70% average efficiency across the 12 resolutions our model tests. The resolution we would target with this pair is 1080p, where AAA games average 61 FPS.

How many FPS do the Core i5-9400F and RTX 4060 Ti 16GB get at 1080p?

At 1080p this combination averages about 61 FPS in AAA games and around 172 FPS in esports titles. In Valorant we estimate up to 275 FPS.

Is this pairing good for 4K gaming?

Playable rather than smooth: about 31 FPS on average in AAA titles at 4K, with the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB setting the limit. Upscaling (DLSS, FSR or XeSS) or lower settings are the usual way to reach 60 FPS.

What power supply do I need for the Core i5-9400F and RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

With an estimated combined draw of 230W across CPU and GPU, we recommend at least a 550W 80+ Gold supply (ideally ATX 3.0) to run with headroom.

Is the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 16 GB of VRAM enough?

In the model, 16 GB covers all 11 games it tracks even at 4K with high textures, so video memory is not the constraint for this pairing.

RELATED COMPARISONS

6