Skip to content

CPU_VS_GPU / 2026-09-11

Intel Core i5-10400FvsNVIDIA RTX 3070

Complete bottleneck analysis at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide (UWQHD/SUWQHD), and 4K with estimated FPS for popular games.

VERDICT2560x1440 · 16GB DDR4/DDR5
THE GRAPHICS CARD LIMITS

8%

ESTIMATED GPU BOTTLENECK

Your GPU (RTX 3070) is a slight limiting factor at 2560x1440, with limited real-world impact. Most titles will run smoothly.

Below 15% this is a normal imbalance: nothing needs changing to play well.

PROCESSOR77%
Intel Core i5-10400FHAS HEADROOM
holds 184 FPS on average
GRAPHICS87%
NVIDIA RTX 3070SETS THE LIMIT
holds 163 FPS on average

Load estimated by the model, not measured on your PC.

The processor leadsBalancedThe graphics card leads
  • PROCESSORIntel Core i5-10400F
  • GRAPHICSNVIDIA RTX 3070
  • MEMORY16GB DDR4/DDR5
  • RESOLUTION2560x1440
51FPSAAA GAMES

Average across the demanding titles at 2560x1440.

217FPSE-SPORTS

Average across the competitive titles, where the processor leads.

600WPOWER SUPPLY YOU NEED

What the build draws (435 W) plus headroom.

PRICE TODAYCore i5-10400F RTX 3070 Affiliate links. Disclosure

DEEP-DIVE ANALYSIS

GENERATED BY THE ENGINE

The Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA RTX 3070 each bring their own character. Below you'll see whether the union is balanced or whether one component wastes the other, with estimated FPS, power draw and recommendations tailored to this specific pair.

Verdict: play this build at 1080p

At 1080p the Core i5-10400F becomes the limiting part (~18% CPU bottleneck), whereas at 4K the RTX 3070 is the limiting part (~47% GPU bottleneck). One number decides the purchase: 1080p is the most demanding of the standard 16:9 sizes that still sustains 72 FPS on average in AAA games, above the 60 FPS bar we treat as smooth. Step up a rung and the frame rate drops below that mark.

As you climb from 1080p to 4K, the load shifts from the processor toward the graphics card: every extra pixel lands on the RTX 3070. Here, efficiency moves from 82% at 1080p to 53% at 4K — which shows the part the frame rate depends on at each end.

In esports titles like Valorant this pair flies — around 341 FPS at 1080p, plenty for a high-refresh monitor. At the other end, a demanding AAA like Alan Wake 2 drops to ~15 FPS at 4K, which is where the RTX 3070's ceiling really shows. Overall, expect about 72 FPS average in AAA games at 1080p and around 31 FPS at 4K.

[CPU] Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F (52/100 on the model's gaming scale) brings 6 cores and 12 threads and determines how many frames per second the system can prepare.

[GPU] RTX 3070

The RTX 3070 scores 33/100 on this model's gaming scale. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 set how far it can go on resolution and texture quality before video memory runs short. It draws every pixel, so its weight grows the higher you push the resolution.

A detail that's easy to overlook: Both parts come from nearby generations, which usually means a natural pairing with no platform surprises. You're combining an Intel platform with an NVIDIA GPU — a perfectly valid mix that imposes no penalty.

DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANYTHING?

At 1440p the RTX 3070 sets the frame rate, but only by 8%, which is inside the normal range. No card in our catalogue clears the bar we use for a recommendation: at least 25% more frames while the Core i5-10400F still keeps it fully fed. The closest, the NVIDIA RTX 5090, adds about 39% in this model. So there is no card we would tell you to buy for this pairing.

PRICE OF EACH PART

Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you. Full disclosure

SPECIFICATIONS

CATALOGUE DATA

[CPU] Intel Core i5-10400F

  • Cores6C / 12T
  • Clock2.94.3 GHz
  • TDP65 W
  • SocketLGA1200
  • Single-thread2,540
  • Multi-thread12,096
  • L3 cache12 MB

[GPU] NVIDIA RTX 3070

  • VRAM8 GB GDDR6
  • Memory bus256-bit
  • TDP220 W
  • G3D Mark22,190
  • Memory bandwidth448 GB/s

BOTTLENECK BY RESOLUTION

SYNERGY · AVERAGE FPS
1920x1080CPU-LIMITED
Synergy82%AAA72E-SPORTS220

Your CPU (Core i5-10400F) partially limits the RTX 3070 at 1920x1080. In CPU-heavy scenes you will lose frames. Consider a CPU upgrade or a higher target resolution.

2560x1440GPU-LIMITED
Synergy92%AAA51E-SPORTS217

Your GPU (RTX 3070) is a slight limiting factor at 2560x1440, with limited real-world impact. Most titles will run smoothly.

3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9)GPU-LIMITED
Synergy78%AAA44E-SPORTS210

Your GPU (RTX 3070) is the limiting factor at 3440x1440 (Ultrawide 21:9). In graphically demanding titles you will see lower frame rates; a faster GPU would deliver a clear improvement.

5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9)GPU-LIMITED
Synergy59%AAA33E-SPORTS200

Your GPU (RTX 3070) severely limits the system at 5120x1440 (Super Ultrawide 32:9), leaving the Core i5-10400F heavily underused. A faster GPU would improve performance dramatically.

3840x2160GPU-LIMITED
Synergy53%AAA31E-SPORTS196

Your GPU (RTX 3070) severely limits the system at 4K, leaving the Core i5-10400F heavily underused. A faster GPU would improve performance dramatically.

ESTIMATED FPS BY GAME

1920x1080
My monitor
E-SPORTSavg 284 FPS
Valorant
341FPS
Counter-Strike 2
217FPS
League of Legends
295FPS
COMPETITIVEavg 156 FPS
Fortnite (Perf Mode)
159FPS
Apex Legends
201FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone
108FPS
AAAavg 72 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
83FPS
Alan Wake 2
46FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
75FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
97FPS
Elden Ring
60FPS
The processor leadsThe graphics card leadsHigh settings · native resolution

SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS

POWER · VRAM & PCIe · RAM

POWER ESTIMATION

Combined TDP:285 W
Min. Recommended PSU:600 W

The Core i5-10400F (65W) and RTX 3070 (220W) add up to roughly 285W under load. Adding 150W for the rest of the system gives 435W, and with a 30% transient margin, 600W is the safe figure.

VIDEO MEMORY AND PCIe

Memory bus (VRAM):256-bit
Memory bandwidth:448 GB/s
PCIe link:Not recorded

The RTX 3070's memory bus (256-bit) and bandwidth (448 GB/s) describe its own video memory, meaning how fast the card reads its 8 GB of GDDR6, not the PCIe link to the processor. The PCIe link depends on the card, the processor and the motherboard slot together; our catalogue does not record PCIe generation or lane count, so the model does not estimate it. It matters most for cards with an eight-lane interface in older PCIe 3.0 boards: check the card's and the board's specifications.

SYSTEM MEMORY

This page assumes:16 GB · dual channel
Model target at 1080p:16 GB

This page assumes 16 GB in dual channel. At 1080p, the resolution recommended above, that meets the model's capacity target of 16 GB (enough for three in four of the games it covers), so more capacity would add little or nothing there. The target stays at 16 GB even at 4K, so a larger kit is for heavy multitasking or mods, not for these games. Memory speed and a second channel act on the processor's ceiling instead: they matter in the games the CPU limits, by an amount that depends on the game, and the calculator lets you enter your own kit.

HOW THIS PAGE IS CALCULATED

ENGINE v2026.08 · 2026-09-11

CALCULATED, NOT WRITTEN

Every figure and every sentence comes from the same deterministic engine, driven by the catalogue specifications. That is what makes it reproducible: with the same engine version (2026.08) and the same catalogue, the same pairing always gives the same result. When either changes, the version and date above change with it, and the changelog says why.

WHERE THE DATA COMES FROM

Specifications come from the official AMD, Intel and NVIDIA datasheets together with PassMark and TechPowerUp. The gaming indices are calibrated against frame rates published by review outlets (TechPowerUp, TechSpot / Hardware Unboxed, Tom's Hardware, Gamers Nexus, Digital Foundry) rather than synthetic scores. That data is compiled, not measured here: this site runs no test bench of its own.

STATED LIMITS

Figures estimate native raster performance at high/ultra quality, with no ray tracing, upscaling or frame generation. We do not yet publish an externally validated error margin — the accuracy page states exactly where that stands.

* Affiliate disclosure: the Amazon links exist to show pricing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Recommendation order is decided by the engine and does not depend on commission.

TRY WITH YOUR OWN HARDWARE

Customize RAM, resolution, and discover upgrade recommendations.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

5
Does the Intel Core i5-10400F bottleneck the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

At 1080p the Core i5-10400F becomes the limiting part (~18% CPU bottleneck), whereas at 4K the RTX 3070 is the limiting part (~47% GPU bottleneck). Overall, the GPU is the limit at high resolution, with 65% average efficiency across the 12 resolutions our model tests. The resolution we would target with this pair is 1080p, where AAA games average 72 FPS.

How many FPS do the Core i5-10400F and RTX 3070 get at 1080p?

At 1080p this combination averages about 72 FPS in AAA games and around 220 FPS in esports titles. In Valorant we estimate up to 341 FPS.

Is this pairing good for 4K gaming?

Playable rather than smooth: about 31 FPS on average in AAA titles at 4K, with the RTX 3070 setting the limit. Upscaling (DLSS, FSR or XeSS) or lower settings are the usual way to reach 60 FPS.

What power supply do I need for the Core i5-10400F and RTX 3070?

With an estimated combined draw of 285W across CPU and GPU, we recommend at least a 600W 80+ Gold supply (ideally ATX 3.0) to run with headroom.

Is the RTX 3070's 8 GB of VRAM enough?

8 GB falls short at 1440p for 3 of the 11 games the model tracks, and for 6 at 4K. In those titles expect to lower texture settings, or to see frame-time spikes if you do not.

RELATED COMPARISONS

6